Peck Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
FRANK MILFORD PECK, No. 77850 Petitioner, vs. THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FLD CARSON CITY; AND THE
NOV 5 2019
HONORABLE JAMES E. WILSON, . A. .S.'ROWNI
DISTRICT JUDGE, REME COURT Respondents, DEPUTY CLERK and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
On August 16, 2019 this court issued an Order instructing petitioner to submit an affidavit that substantially complies with Form 4 of the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure, accompanied by a financial certificate from the Department of Corrections within 30 days. Because petitioner had previously been granted three extensions of time, the order further advised petitioner that no further extensions of time would be granted and that failure to comply would result in dismissal.
To date, petitioner has not responded to this court's August 16, 2019, order. Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed.
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BRQWN
CUtked
cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Frank Milford Peck
SUPREME COURT Attorney General/Carson City OF NEVADA Attorney General/Las Vegas Carson City Clerk
CLERK'S ORDER
(01-1947 o4ktits.
lq-q(330
117-7;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peck Vs. Dist. Ct. (State) (Peck Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.