Peck v. Snyder
This text of 13 Mich. 21 (Peck v. Snyder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I see no error in the rulings of the Circuit Judge in this case; and as the case was tried by jury, it is to tlie rulings and decision of tlie Court alone that we shall direct our attention. The finding of fects belonged neither to the Circuit Judge nor to this Court.
I can see but one exception taken below, to wbicli our attention can be directed, and that is, to the refusal of the Judge to direct the jury to find specially, upon certain questions, in case they found a general verdict. This is a novel request. A jury may find a general or a special verdict, according to the exigencies of the case; but ' a Judge cannot direct or compel them to do either, and more particularly, not to give reasons for a general finding. Harper’s answer renders the question put to him immaterial, and there .was no error, therefore, in the ruling of the Court allowing the question.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Mich. 21, 1864 Mich. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peck-v-snyder-mich-1864.