Peck v. Peck

15 N.E. 12, 113 Ind. 168, 1888 Ind. LEXIS 19
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided January 25, 1888·No. No. 13,103·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Elliott, J.

The trial court granted the appellee a divorce and awarded her as alimony the sum of three hundred and fifty dollars. Of this allowance appellant complains.

A very broad discretion is vested in the trial court in the matter of awarding a wife alimony, and it is only where there is a manifest abuse of discretion that this court will interfere. It rests upon the appellant in such cases to show an abuse of discretion, and if he fails to do so his appeal will be unavailing. In this case the appellant has signally failed. Ifert v. [169]*169Ifert, 29 Ind. 473; Powell v. Powell, 53 Ind. 513; Conn v. Conn, 57 Ind. 323; Eastes v. Eastes, 79 Ind. 363; Metzler v. Metzler, 99 Ind. 384; Logan v. Logan, 90 Ind. 107.

Filed Jan. 25, 1888.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peck v. Peck, 15 N.E. 12, 113 Ind. 168, 1888 Ind. LEXIS 19 (Ind. 1888).

15 N.E. 12 (Peck v. Peck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gussman v. Gussman
39 N.E. 918 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1895)
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Jacobs
36 N.E. 301 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1894)
Mercer v. Mercer
17 N.E. 182 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1888)