Peck v. Peck

15 N.E. 12, 113 Ind. 168, 1888 Ind. LEXIS 19
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 25, 1888
DocketNo. 13,103
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 15 N.E. 12 (Peck v. Peck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peck v. Peck, 15 N.E. 12, 113 Ind. 168, 1888 Ind. LEXIS 19 (Ind. 1888).

Opinion

Elliott, J.

The trial court granted the appellee a divorce and awarded her as alimony the sum of three hundred and fifty dollars. Of this allowance appellant complains.

A very broad discretion is vested in the trial court in the matter of awarding a wife alimony, and it is only where there is a manifest abuse of discretion that this court will interfere. It rests upon the appellant in such cases to show an abuse of discretion, and if he fails to do so his appeal will be unavailing. In this case the appellant has signally failed. Ifert v. [169]*169Ifert, 29 Ind. 473; Powell v. Powell, 53 Ind. 513; Conn v. Conn, 57 Ind. 323; Eastes v. Eastes, 79 Ind. 363; Metzler v. Metzler, 99 Ind. 384; Logan v. Logan, 90 Ind. 107.

Filed Jan. 25, 1888.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gussman v. Gussman
39 N.E. 918 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1895)
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Jacobs
36 N.E. 301 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1894)
Mercer v. Mercer
17 N.E. 182 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 N.E. 12, 113 Ind. 168, 1888 Ind. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peck-v-peck-ind-1888.