Peck v. Greene
This text of 63 A. 489 (Peck v. Greene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fred B. Peck, the appellant, being next of kin to the intestate and having applied to be appointed administrator within thirty days after the decease, and being a suitable person, should have received the appointment instead of Charles W. Greene, who was the choice of some of the heirs and who is likewise found to have been a suitable person. Where the contest is between two nominees, both suitable, and one of whom is next of kin, the statute gives the right of appointment to the next of kin. Johnson v. Johnson, 15 R. I. 109; Murray v. Angell, 16 R. I. 692; Mowry v. Latham, 17 R. I. 480. Indeed, as was held in Randall v. Randall, J. T. W. 1291, Supreme Court, appellate division, 1904, if the application of the next of kin is made after the thirty days, but before the actual appointment of an administrator, we think a fair construction of the statute gives him the preference.
The appeal will be remitted to the Superior Court with direction to enter a decree in accordance with this opinion, under sec. 802, Court and Practice Act.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 A. 489, 27 R.I. 487, 1906 R.I. LEXIS 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peck-v-greene-ri-1906.