Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Peck v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

Peck v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

191 P.3d 669, 221 Or. App. 700
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 13, 2008
DocketA129393
StatusPublished

This text of 191 P.3d 669 (Peck v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peck v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, 191 P.3d 669, 221 Or. App. 700 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

191 P.3d 669 (2008)
221 Or. App. 700

Walter Carl PECK, Petitioner,
v.
BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.

A129393.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted June 27, 2008.
Decided August 13, 2008.

Irene B. Taylor, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, and Ingrid Swensen, Executive Director, Office of Public Defense Services.

Erin C. Lagesen, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Ryan Kahn, Assistant Attorney General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and HUCKLEBERRY, Judge pro tempore.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Cole v. Board of Parole, 220 Or.App. 362, 186 P.3d 321 (2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cole v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
186 P.3d 321 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)
Peck v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
191 P.3d 669 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 P.3d 669, 221 Or. App. 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peck-v-board-of-parole-and-post-prison-supervision-orctapp-2008.