Peck v. Bligh
40 Ill. 112
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peck v. Bligh. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Ill. 317 →
Opinion
We do not think there are sufficient grounds for a continuance. By the use of reasonable diligence we think the case may be prepared for a hearing at the present term.. We will, however, extend the time for filing an abstract of the record until the fifteenth day of the term.
Continuance refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peck v. Bligh, 40 Ill. 112 (Ill. 1865).
40 Ill. 112 (Peck v. Bligh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.