Peck, Stow & Wilcox Co. v. Fray

92 F. 947, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2994
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut
DecidedFebruary 27, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 92 F. 947 (Peck, Stow & Wilcox Co. v. Fray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peck, Stow & Wilcox Co. v. Fray, 92 F. 947, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2994 (circtdct 1899).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An attorney’s docket fee, under section 824, Rev. St. U. S., is only taxable upon final hearing, or upon a rehearing allowed upon the merits of the case, on demurrer to pleadings, and then only when such hearing disposes of the case. The decree in this case, although for costs, and authorizing execution, is final only as to an interlocutory motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 F. 947, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peck-stow-wilcox-co-v-fray-circtdct-1899.