Peck (Frank) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
FRANK MILFORD PECK, No. 80103 Appellant,
vS.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
FILED
Respondent. _cs,N 6 2620 EU A. BROWN CLE REME COURT
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL EY f.1LITY CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from district court orders "denying NRCP Rule 60(B) motion" and denying a "motion for leave to rehear NRCP Rule 60(b)(3) motion." Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Lynne K. Simons, Judge.
This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.
Specifically, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order "denying NRCP Rule 60(B) motion" and an order denying a "motion for leave to rehear NRCP Rule 60(b)(3) motiod in a criminal matter. See Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990); see also Phelps v. State, 111 Nev. 1021, 1022-23, 900 P.2d 344, 344-45 (1995). Accordingly, this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
eiekisaal LIZ414.,A) , J.
, J.
Stiglich Silver
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 70.00k
(0) 1947A
cc: Hon. Lynne K. Simons, District Judge Frank Milford Peck Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peck (Frank) Vs. State (Peck (Frank) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.