Pechter Baking Co. v. Bober

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pechter Baking Co. v. Bober

240 A.D. 848

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 240 A.D. 848 (Pechter Baking Co. v. Bober) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pechter Baking Co. v. Bober, 240 A.D. 848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting an injunction pendente lite reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, the respondent’s right to equitable relief is not clear — there is a question for trial as to whether the respondent will be entitled to a permanent injunction. The granting of a temporary injunction was not, therefore, a proper exercise of discretion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting an injunction pendente lite reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, the respondent’s right to equitable relief is not clear — there is a question for trial as to whether the respondent will be entitled to a permanent injunction. The granting of a temporary injunction was not, therefore, a proper exercise of discretion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pechter-baking-co-v-bober-nyappdiv-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack