Peccole v. Dist. Ct. (City of Las Vegas)

Nevada Supreme Court

Peccole v. Dist. Ct. (City of Las Vegas)

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided December 16, 2016·No. 71608·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ROBERT N. PECCOLE; AND NANCY A. No. 71608 PECCOLE, Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, ALE IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF DEC 1 6 2016 CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE DOUGLAS SMITH, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and CITY OF LAS VEGAS; FORE STARS, LTD.; 180 LAND CO., LLC; SEVENTY ACRES, LLC; EHB COMPANIES, LLC; YOHAN LOWIE; VICKIE DEHART; AND FRANK PANKRATZ, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION This original petition for a writ of prohibition challenges the respondent district court's jurisdiction to decide a pending motion to dismiss filed by the defendants who remain parties below. . Having considered the petition and appendix, we conclude that petitioners have not demonstrated that a writ of prohibition is warranted. NRS 34.330; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228-29, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Appeals from interlocutory orders do not divest the district court of jurisdiction over the case or to resolve matters

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A c(4:144 that do not affect the appeal's merits. Mack-Manley v. Manley, 122 Nev. 849, 855, 138 P.3d 525, 529-30 (2006); Hanley v. Zenoff, 81 Nev. 9, 13, 398 P.2d 241, 243 (1965). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Chs2- , J. Cherry

D 1,0-4) Irv) Douglas J.

Gibbons

cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge Peccole & Peccole Las Vegas City Attorney The Jimmerson Law Firm, P.0 Sklar Williams LLP EHB Companies, LLC Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (D) 1947A 0

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ROBERT N. PECCOLE; AND NANCY A. No. 71608 PECCOLE, Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, ALE IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF DEC 1 6 2016 CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE DOUGLAS SMITH, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and CITY OF LAS VEGAS; FORE STARS, LTD.; 180 LAND CO., LLC; SEVENTY ACRES, LLC; EHB COMPANIES, LLC; YOHAN LOWIE; VICKIE DEHART; AND FRANK PANKRATZ, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION This original petition for a writ of prohibition challenges the respondent district court's jurisdiction to decide a pending motion to dismiss filed by the defendants who remain parties below. . Having considered the petition and appendix, we conclude that petitioners have not demonstrated that a writ of prohibition is warranted. NRS 34.330; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228-29, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Appeals from interlocutory orders do not divest the district court of jurisdiction over the case or to resolve matters

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A c(4:144 that do not affect the appeal's merits. Mack-Manley v. Manley, 122 Nev. 849, 855, 138 P.3d 525, 529-30 (2006); Hanley v. Zenoff, 81 Nev. 9, 13, 398 P.2d 241, 243 (1965). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Chs2- , J. Cherry

D 1,0-4) Irv) Douglas J.

Gibbons

cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge Peccole & Peccole Las Vegas City Attorney The Jimmerson Law Firm, P.0 Sklar Williams LLP EHB Companies, LLC Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (D) 1947A 0

Peccole v. Dist. Ct. (City of Las Vegas), (Neb. 2016).

Pincite

Peccole v. Dist. Ct. (City of Las Vegas) (Peccole v. Dist. Ct. (City of Las Vegas)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related