Peasley v. State
This text of 98 A.D.2d 927 (Peasley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Koreman, P. J.), entered April 8, 1983, which denied claimant’s cross motion for summary judgment and granted the State’s motion to dismiss the claim. The claim was properly dismissed for the reason that Supreme Court is the proper forum to hear claimant’s complaint (see Matter of Peasley v Flacke, 98 AD2d 915). Order affirmed, without costs. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur. [118 Misc 2d 827.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 A.D.2d 927, 471 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peasley-v-state-nyappdiv-1983.