Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pease v. State

Pease v. State

570 So. 2d 1116, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9169, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2949
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 7, 1990
DocketNo. 89-03027
StatusPublished

This text of 570 So. 2d 1116 (Pease v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pease v. State, 570 So. 2d 1116, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9169, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2949 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s convictions. Since the defendant’s sentence constitutes a more than one cell increase for a violation of probation, see Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989), we reverse and remand for resentencing within the range permitted by the guidelines.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and HALL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lambert v. State
545 So. 2d 838 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
570 So. 2d 1116, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9169, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pease-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.