Pease v. Hansen

Supreme Court

Pease v. Hansen

404 U.S. 70, 92 S. Ct. 318, 30 L. Ed. 2d 224, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 416

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 16, 1971

Docket70-5376

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 404 U.S. 70 (Pease v. Hansen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pease v. Hansen, 404 U.S. 70, 92 S. Ct. 318, 30 L. Ed. 2d 224, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 416 (1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion of the appellant for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

Whether a welfare program is or is not federally funded is irrelevant to the constitutional principles enunciated in Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U. S. 618. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Montana is reversed.

The Chief Justice is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion of the appellant for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

Whether a welfare program is or is not federally funded is irrelevant to the constitutional principles enunciated in Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U. S. 618. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Montana is reversed.

The Chief Justice is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

404 U.S. 70, 92 S. Ct. 318, 30 L. Ed. 2d 224, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pease-v-hansen-scotus-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack