Pease v. Gleason
8 Johns. 409
Opinion
The adjournment was no serious inconvenience, and it rested in the discretion of the justice, which was not abused in this case. There is no evidence of it. The proof of the absence of the party satisfied the justice, and that was sufficient.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pease v. Gleason, 8 Johns. 409 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1811).
8 Johns. 409 (Pease v. Gleason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jourdan v. Healey
19 N.Y.S. 240 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1892)
Onderdonk v. Ranlett
3 Hill & Den. 323 (New York Supreme Court, 1842)