Pease v. Gleason
8 Johns. 409
This text of 8 Johns. 409 (Pease v. Gleason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pease v. Gleason, 8 Johns. 409 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1811).
Opinion
The adjournment was no serious inconvenience, and it rested in the discretion of the justice, which was not abused in this case. There is no evidence of it. The proof of the absence of the party satisfied the justice, and that was sufficient.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jourdan v. Healey
19 N.Y.S. 240 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1892)
Onderdonk v. Ranlett
3 Hill & Den. 323 (New York Supreme Court, 1842)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 Johns. 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pease-v-gleason-nysupct-1811.