Pease v. Blossom

New York Supreme Court

Pease v. Blossom

1 How. Pr. 222

DecidedSeptember 15, 1845

StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 222 (Pease v. Blossom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pease v. Blossom, 1 How. Pr. 222 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

Beardsley, Justice.

Thought the motion should be granted. The cause of action arose in Washington county, and the defendants allege a failure of part of the consideration of the note, and state that their witnesses will be necessary to prove that. I am unable to see the materiality of the witnesses on the part of the plaintiff, residing in New York and Kings; the note was given in Washington county and it appears that the proof required, will be in Washington county.

Motion granted, and cause referred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beardsley, Justice.

Thought the motion should be granted. The cause of action arose in Washington county, and the defendants allege a failure of part of the consideration of the note, and state that their witnesses will be necessary to prove that. I am unable to see the materiality of the witnesses on the part of the plaintiff, residing in New York and Kings; the note was given in Washington county and it appears that the proof required, will be in Washington county.

Motion granted, and cause referred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 How. Pr. 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pease-v-blossom-nysupct-1845.