Pease v. Allas

110 Mass. 157
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 15, 1872·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Chapman, C. J.

By the Gen. Sts. e. 92, § 6, a will must be subscribed by three or more competent witnesses. They must be competent at the time of the attestation of the will. By the common law, it was a settled principle that husbands and wives could not in any case be admitted as witnesses for or against each other, independently of the question of interest. None of our statutes have changed the rule in this respect as to the attestation of wills, and the rule applies to such attestation. Davis v. Dinwoody, 4 T. R. 678. Hatfield v. Thorp, 5 B. & Ald. 589. Sullivan v. Sullivan, 106 Mass. 474.

[158]*158As the wife of the testator in this case was not a competent witness when the will was executed, his death did not make her competent. Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pease v. Allas, 110 Mass. 157 (Mass. 1872).

110 Mass. 157 (Pease v. Allas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Hara v. Stanziani
1 Mass. Supp. 469 (Massachusetts Superior Court, 1980)
Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Bacon
229 Mass. 585 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1918)
O'Connell v. Dow
66 N.E. 788 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1903)
Fisher v. Spence
37 N.E. 314 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1894)
Hodgman v. Kittredge
32 A. 158 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1892)
Vrooman v. Powers
47 Ohio St. (N.S.) 191 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1890)
Jenkins v. Dawes
115 Mass. 599 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1874)