Pease, Christopher v. Production Work 707
This text of Pease, Christopher v. Production Work 707 (Pease, Christopher v. Production Work 707) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
3.51mith 0%.:th QInurf Hf Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
October 25, 2004 Before
Hon. WHLIMdJ. BmmR, Circuit Judge Hon. FRMM H. EASHRBMMK, Circuit Judge
Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge
CHRISTOPHER PEASE, VINCE VITI, WILLARD Appeal from the United BmmE, and MKmAmJGEMh States District Court Plaintiffs-Appellants, for the Northern
District of Illinois, No, 04-1928 v, Eastern Division. PRODUCTION WORKERS UNION OF CHICAGO AND NO- 02 C3 6756 VICINITY LOCAL 707; RANDALL INDUSTRIES, James F- HOJ-derman, INC.; and RANDALL RENTS OF INDIANA, INC., L7Udge-
Defendants—Appellees.
Order
The sentence at page 4 of the opinion, reading "Walker testified, without contradiction, that he had been promised when he transferred to the sales position that he could go back to driving if the new job did not pan out." is amended to read: "There was uncontradicted testimony that both Randall and Local 707 assured Walker, before he transferred to the sales position, that he could go back to driving if the new job did not pan out."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pease, Christopher v. Production Work 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pease-christopher-v-production-work-707-ca7-2004.