Pease, Christopher v. Production Work 707

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedOctober 25, 2004
Docket04-1928
StatusPublished

This text of Pease, Christopher v. Production Work 707 (Pease, Christopher v. Production Work 707) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pease, Christopher v. Production Work 707, (7th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

3.51mith 0%.:th QInurf Hf Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

October 25, 2004 Before

Hon. WHLIMdJ. BmmR, Circuit Judge Hon. FRMM H. EASHRBMMK, Circuit Judge

Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

CHRISTOPHER PEASE, VINCE VITI, WILLARD Appeal from the United BmmE, and MKmAmJGEMh States District Court Plaintiffs-Appellants, for the Northern

District of Illinois, No, 04-1928 v, Eastern Division. PRODUCTION WORKERS UNION OF CHICAGO AND NO- 02 C3 6756 VICINITY LOCAL 707; RANDALL INDUSTRIES, James F- HOJ-derman, INC.; and RANDALL RENTS OF INDIANA, INC., L7Udge-

Defendants—Appellees.

Order

The sentence at page 4 of the opinion, reading "Walker testified, without contradiction, that he had been promised when he transferred to the sales position that he could go back to driving if the new job did not pan out." is amended to read: "There was uncontradicted testimony that both Randall and Local 707 assured Walker, before he transferred to the sales position, that he could go back to driving if the new job did not pan out."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pease, Christopher v. Production Work 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pease-christopher-v-production-work-707-ca7-2004.