Pearson v. Wilson
This text of 214 A.D. 848 (Pearson v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order is affirmed because the motion papers fail to state what the amendments are which are sought and, therefore, it is impossible to pass upon their necessity. All concur. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Davis, Sears and Taylor, JJ. Order denying motion to amend certiorari order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to renew motion upon proper papers.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 A.D. 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-wilson-nyappdiv-1925.