Pearson v. Westbrook
206 N.C. 910
Opinion
Tbe plaintiff’s production of tbe draft in tbe trial was evidence of its nonpayment by tbe drawer. It contained a waiver of protest which was binding upon all parties — a waiver of formal protest, of presentment, and dishonor. Shaw Bros. v. McNeill, 95 N. C., 535; Rasberry v. West, 205 N. C., 406.
We are of opinion that none of tbe appellant’s exceptions to tbe admission or rejection of evidence can be sustained. Upon examination of tbe whole record we find
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pearson v. Westbrook, 206 N.C. 910 (N.C. 1934).
206 N.C. 910 (Pearson v. Westbrook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. Bank of Washington
120 S.E.2d 830 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)
Bratten, Admr. v. McKelvey
25 N.E.2d 366 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1939)
H. L. Vollers Co. v. Todd
194 S.E. 84 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)