Pearson v. TREASURER OF STATE OF MISSOURI

Missouri Court of Appeals

Pearson v. TREASURER OF STATE OF MISSOURI

229 S.W.3d 85, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 340

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 27, 2007·No. ED 88747·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph M. Pearson appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (Commission) Final Award finding no Second Injury Fund liability for Appellant’s disability. We have reviewed the briefs of -the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission’s Award is not contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Jennings v. Station Casino St. Charles, 196 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph M. Pearson appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (Commission) Final Award finding no Second Injury Fund liability for Appellant’s disability. We have reviewed the briefs of -the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission’s Award is not contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Jennings v. Station Casino St. Charles, 196 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Pearson v. TREASURER OF STATE OF MISSOURI, 229 S.W.3d 85, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 340 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

229 S.W.3d 85 (Pearson v. TREASURER OF STATE OF MISSOURI) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related