Pearson v. The Alsalfa

44 F. 358, 1890 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24
CourtDistrict Court, D. South Carolina
DecidedDecember 14, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 44 F. 358 (Pearson v. The Alsalfa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pearson v. The Alsalfa, 44 F. 358, 1890 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24 (D.S.C. 1890).

Opinion

Simonton, J.

The libel is for seaman’s wages. Libelant moves for a warrant of arrest, as the vessel is about to proceed to sea. The only question is, can such a warrant b.e issued on Sunday? The law of South Carolina forbids the service of civil process on Sunday. This regulation is purely municipal, and can control only the process in the state courts. If it can be construed to apply to process on the law side of the courts of the United States, under section 914, Rev. St., it cannot be made to apply to process out of the court of admiralty, which is expressly excepted from this section. The question now made is entirely new. There are no authorities in point, and very few bear on the question. Mr. Desty, in his little book on Shipping & Admiralty, § 181, says that Sunday is not recognized by the maritime law. Although the authorities he quotes do not bear him out in this broad statement, (The Richard Matt, 1 Biss. 440; Johnson v. The Cyane, 1 Sawy. 150,) it seems to have. support. Sailors pan be made to work on Sunday notwithstanding that a law of the port may forbid it. Ulary v. The Washington, [359]*359Crabbe, 208. A vessel can leave a port on Sunday, although the law of the port may forbid travel on that day. Grier, J., in Philadelphia, W. & B. R. Co. v. Philadelphia, etc., Tow-Boat Co., 23 How. 209.

This court is always open for the redress of wrongs. Seamen specially are under its protection. In the present case the vessel has unexpectedly changed her day for sailing, and has anticipated it by proposing to sail to-day. The libelant did not learn that his wages would not be paid in time to begin his case before to-day. In this view of the case, and in the absence of authority to the contrary, let the warrant of arrest issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Harbin
27 F.2d 892 (N.D. Mississippi, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 F. 358, 1890 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-the-alsalfa-scd-1890.