Pearson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Pearson v. State

485 S.W.3d 825, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 339, 2016 WL 1453024

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 12, 2016·No. No. ED 103236·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Pearson appeals the judgment denying'his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Pearson appeals the judgment denying'his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Pearson v. State, 485 S.W.3d 825, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 339, 2016 WL 1453024 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

485 S.W.3d 825 (Pearson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.