Pearson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Pearson v. State

485 S.W.3d 825, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 339, 2016 WL 1453024

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 12, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103236

StatusPublished

This text of 485 S.W.3d 825 (Pearson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearson v. State, 485 S.W.3d 825, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 339, 2016 WL 1453024 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Pearson appeals the judgment denying'his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Pearson appeals the judgment denying'his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

485 S.W.3d 825, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 339, 2016 WL 1453024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-state-moctapp-2016.