Pearson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Pearson v. State

299 S.E.2d 111, 165 Ga. App. 28, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 3102

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 4, 1983

Docket64916

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 299 S.E.2d 111 (Pearson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearson v. State, 299 S.E.2d 111, 165 Ga. App. 28, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 3102 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Carley, Judge.

Appellant appeals from his conviction of one count of burglary. Appointed counsel for appellant has filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which arguably could support the appeal. In addition, as required by Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976), we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if any errors of law occurred. We find that the points raised are without merit and our independent examination discloses no errors requiring reversal. Accordingly, we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm appellant’s conviction. After a review of the entire record, we find that any rational trior of fact could reasonably have found from the evidence adduced at trial proof of appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528) (1980).

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, C. J., and Quillian, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carley, Judge.

Appellant appeals from his conviction of one count of burglary. Appointed counsel for appellant has filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which arguably could support the appeal. In addition, as required by Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976), we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if any errors of law occurred. We find that the points raised are without merit and our independent examination discloses no errors requiring reversal. Accordingly, we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm appellant’s conviction. After a review of the entire record, we find that any rational trior of fact could reasonably have found from the evidence adduced at trial proof of appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528) (1980).

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, C. J., and Quillian, P. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 S.E.2d 111, 165 Ga. App. 28, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 3102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-state-gactapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack