Pearson v. State

299 S.E.2d 111, 165 Ga. App. 28, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 3102
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 4, 1983·No. 64916·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Carley, Judge.

Appellant appeals from his conviction of one count of burglary. Appointed counsel for appellant has filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which arguably could support the appeal. In addition, as required by Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976), we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if any errors of law occurred. We find that the points raised are without merit and our independent examination discloses no errors requiring reversal. Accordingly, we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm appellant’s conviction. After a review of the entire record, we find that any rational trior of fact could reasonably have found from the evidence adduced at trial proof of appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528) (1980).

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, C. J., and Quillian, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pearson v. State, 299 S.E.2d 111, 165 Ga. App. 28, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 3102 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).

299 S.E.2d 111 (Pearson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reeves v. Yellow Transportation, Inc.
613 S.E.2d 350 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)