Pearson v. State

126 S.E. 20, 33 Ga. App. 342, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 747
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 13, 1925
Docket15987
StatusPublished

This text of 126 S.E. 20 (Pearson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pearson v. State, 126 S.E. 20, 33 Ga. App. 342, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 747 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

LTjke, J.

The evidence in this ease almost demanded, if indeed it did not demand, the defendant’s conviction. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial, in the light of the record, are without merit. The motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 S.E. 20, 33 Ga. App. 342, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-state-gactapp-1925.