Pearson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pearson v. State

611 So. 2d 625, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 640, 1993 WL 17731

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 27, 1993

DocketNo. 91-01948

StatusPublished

This text of 611 So. 2d 625 (Pearson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearson v. State, 611 So. 2d 625, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 640, 1993 WL 17731 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Lorenzo Pearson appeals his sentences in two cases. In case no. 90-1160, he challenges his sentence of thirty years imprisonment after revocation of his habitualized probation. We affirm the sentence on the authority of King v. State, 597 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA1992). In affirming, we acknowledge conflict with State v. Kendrick, 596 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 5th DCA1992).

The state concedes the trial court erred in sentencing Pearson to one year imprisonment for petit theft, count II of case no. 90-11899. Pearson could receive no more than sixty days incarceration. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for correction of sentence for count II of case no. 90-11899.

Affirm in part; reverse in part.

FRANK, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI