Pearson v. State

616 So. 2d 49, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 240, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 607, 1993 WL 101948
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 8, 1993
DocketNo. 80488
StatusPublished

This text of 616 So. 2d 49 (Pearson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pearson v. State, 616 So. 2d 49, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 240, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 607, 1993 WL 101948 (Fla. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Pearson v. State, 603 So.2d 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), based on express and direct conflict with Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla.1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The opinion below is quashed to the extent it is inconsistent with Lamont and remanded for reconsideration.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lamont v. State
610 So. 2d 435 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Pearson v. State
603 So. 2d 676 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
616 So. 2d 49, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 240, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 607, 1993 WL 101948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-state-fla-1993.