Pearson v. State
616 So. 2d 49, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 240, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 607, 1993 WL 101948
Opinion
We have for review Pearson v. State, 603 So.2d 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), based on express and direct conflict with Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla.1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The opinion below is quashed to the extent it is inconsistent with Lamont and remanded for reconsideration.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pearson v. State, 616 So. 2d 49, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 240, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 607, 1993 WL 101948 (Fla. 1993).
616 So. 2d 49 (Pearson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lamont v. State
610 So. 2d 435 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Pearson v. State
603 So. 2d 676 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)