Pearson v. State
223 So. 2d 736, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2311
Opinions
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After argument and upon further consideration, we have determined the writ was improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pearson v. State, 223 So. 2d 736, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2311 (Fla. 1969).
223 So. 2d 736 (Pearson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Belton v. State
217 So. 2d 97 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)
State v. Youngblood
217 So. 2d 98 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)
Baker v. State
202 So. 2d 563 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)
Walker v. State
113 So. 96 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Pearson v. State
213 So. 2d 616 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)