Pearson v. State

223 So. 2d 736, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2311
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 18, 1969
DocketNo. 37969
StatusPublished

This text of 223 So. 2d 736 (Pearson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pearson v. State, 223 So. 2d 736, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2311 (Fla. 1969).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After argument and upon further consideration, we have determined the writ was improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and CALDWELL (Retired), JJ., concur. ERVIN, C. J., concurs specially to the judgment with Opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Belton v. State
217 So. 2d 97 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)
State v. Youngblood
217 So. 2d 98 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)
Baker v. State
202 So. 2d 563 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)
Walker v. State
113 So. 96 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Pearson v. State
213 So. 2d 616 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 So. 2d 736, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-state-fla-1969.