Pearson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Pearson v. State

771 S.W.2d 249, 299 Ark. 24, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 254

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 22, 1989·No. RC 89-18·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner Tommy Pearson, by his attorney, has filed a second motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Donald K. Campbell III, has by affidavit admitted it was his fault that the record was not timely tendered.

We find that the error, admittedly made by the criminal defendant’s attorney, is good cause to grant the motion for a rule on the clerk.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Petitioner Tommy Pearson, by his attorney, has filed a second motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Donald K. Campbell III, has by affidavit admitted it was his fault that the record was not timely tendered.

We find that the error, admittedly made by the criminal defendant’s attorney, is good cause to grant the motion for a rule on the clerk.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Pearson v. State, 771 S.W.2d 249, 299 Ark. 24, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 254 (Ark. 1989).

Pincite

771 S.W.2d 249 (Pearson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.