Pearson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided September 2, 2021·No. 20-350·Unpublished

Opinion

In the Anited States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20-350V (not to be published) KKK KKK KK KK KK KK KK KK KK OK KK KK OK KRISTINA PEARSON, Filed: June 16, 2021 Petitioner, V.

Decision by Stipulation; Damages; Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Transverse SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Myelitis (“TM”).

*

HUMAN SERVICES, : *

Respondent. *

* *

HK OK OK OK OK KK OK OK OK OK OK ok Ok Ok Ok OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr., Rawls Law Group, Richmond, VA, for Petitioner Mark K. Hellie, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION!

On March 27, 2020, Kristina Pearson (“Petitioner”) filed a petition, seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Vaccine Program”).” Pet., ECF No. 1. Petitioner alleges she suffered from transverse myelitis (“TM”) as a result of the influenza (“flu”) vaccination she received on October 11, 2018. See Stipulation { 2, 4, dated June 15, 2021 (ECF No. 38); see also Petition.

Respondent denies “that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged TM or any other injury

' Although this Decision has been formally designated “not to be published,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims’ website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 (2012). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. As provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the Decision in its present form will be available. Jd.

* The Vaccine Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10-34 (2012)) (hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). All subsequent references to sections of the Vaccine Act shall be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa. or her current condition.” See Stipulation § 6. Nonetheless, both parties, while maintaining their above-stated positions, agreed in a stipulation filed June 15, 2021 that the issues before them can be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding Petitioner compensation.

I have reviewed the file, and based upon that review, I conclude that the parties’ stipulation is reasonable. I therefore adopt it as my decision in awarding damages on the terms set forth therein.

The stipulation awards: a lump sum of $190,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.

Stipulation 8. This award represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

I approve a Vaccine Program award in the requested amount set forth above to be made to Petitioner. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment herewith.*

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Katherine E. Oler Katherine E. Oler Special Master

> Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by jointly filing notice renouncing their right to seek review. Jn the Gnited States Court of Federal Claims

KRISTINA PEARSON,

Petitioner, Case No. 20-350V (ECF) V. CHIEF SPECIAL MASTER CORCORAN SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Kristina Pearson, petitioner, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (the “Vaccine Program’). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of the influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which is a vaccine contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received the flu vaccine on October 11, 2018.

3. The vaccination was administered within the United States.

4, Petitioner alleges that she sustained transverse myelitis (“TM”) that was caused by her receipt of the flu vaccine and alleges that she experienced the residual

effects of this injury for more than six months. 5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement ofa civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of her alleged injuries.

6. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged TM or any other injury or her current condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a\(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $190,000.00 in the form ofa check payable to petitioner. This

amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition.

10. Petitioner and her attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not

primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made

or can reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs,

2 insurance policies, Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pearson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2021).

Pearson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Pearson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-10-34
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10-34
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a