Pearson v. Saar

Fourth Circuit

Pearson v. Saar

201 F. App'x 165

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 28, 2006·No. No. 05-7304·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pearson v. Saar, No. CA-03-1705-RDB (D.Md. July 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pearson v. Saar, No. CA-03-1705-RDB (D.Md. July 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Pearson v. Saar, 201 F. App'x 165 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

201 F. App'x 165 (Pearson v. Saar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related