Pearson v. Royal Caribbean Cruises
751 So. 2d 125, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 173, 2000 WL 27546
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 12, 2000
DocketNo. 3D98-2773
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 751 So. 2d 125 (Pearson v. Royal Caribbean Cruises) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pearson v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, 751 So. 2d 125, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 173, 2000 WL 27546 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Clement v. Rousselle Corp., 372 So.2d 1156, 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)(“A defendant who has answered with a general denial, is entitled to prove, and to argue to the jury, that the accident was due solely to the negligence of a person not party to the suit.”), cert. denied, 383 So.2d 1191 (Fla.1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Vila v. Philip Morris USA Inc.
215 So. 3d 82 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
751 So. 2d 125, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 173, 2000 WL 27546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-royal-caribbean-cruises-fladistctapp-2000.