Pearson v. Royal Caribbean Cruises
751 So. 2d 125, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 173, 2000 WL 27546
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 12, 2000·No. No. 3D98-2773·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. See Clement v. Rousselle Corp., 372 So.2d 1156, 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)(“A defendant who has answered with a general denial, is entitled to prove, and to argue to the jury, that the accident was due solely to the negligence of a person not party to the suit.”), cert. denied, 383 So.2d 1191 (Fla.1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pearson v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, 751 So. 2d 125, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 173, 2000 WL 27546 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
751 So. 2d 125 (Pearson v. Royal Caribbean Cruises) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vila v. Philip Morris USA Inc.
215 So. 3d 82 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)