Pearson v. Pearson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pearson v. Pearson

40 A.D.2d 666, 337 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3582

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 31, 1972·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 8, 1971, denying defendant’s motion to strike plaintiff’s jury demand and to place this cause on the Nonjury Calendar, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the motion granted. Appellant shall recover of respondent $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. While equity does not have jurisdiction in all matters of partnership (Burnstine v. Geist, 257 App. Div. 792), it does in this case which is essentially one for an accounting. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Nunez, Kupferman, Murphy and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 8, 1971, denying defendant’s motion to strike plaintiff’s jury demand and to place this cause on the Nonjury Calendar, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the motion granted. Appellant shall recover of respondent $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. While equity does not have jurisdiction in all matters of partnership (Burnstine v. Geist, 257 App. Div. 792), it does in this case which is essentially one for an accounting. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Nunez, Kupferman, Murphy and Eager, JJ.

Pearson v. Pearson, 40 A.D.2d 666, 337 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

40 A.D.2d 666 (Pearson v. Pearson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related