Pearson v. Pearson

40 A.D.2d 666, 337 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3582
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 31, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 40 A.D.2d 666 (Pearson v. Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pearson v. Pearson, 40 A.D.2d 666, 337 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 8, 1971, denying defendant’s motion to strike plaintiff’s jury demand and to place this cause on the Nonjury Calendar, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the motion granted. Appellant shall recover of respondent $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. While equity does not have jurisdiction in all matters of partnership (Burnstine v. Geist, 257 App. Div. 792), it does in this case which is essentially one for an accounting. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Nunez, Kupferman, Murphy and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cognetta v. Valencia Developers, Inc.
8 A.D.3d 318 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Katz v. Powers
92 Misc. 2d 892 (Suffolk County District Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 A.D.2d 666, 337 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-pearson-nyappdiv-1972.