Pearson v. Oregon State Penitentiary

754 P.2d 35, 91 Or. App. 184
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 11, 1988
Docket07-87-393; CA A45529
StatusPublished

This text of 754 P.2d 35 (Pearson v. Oregon State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pearson v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 754 P.2d 35, 91 Or. App. 184 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary. He contends that the disciplinary committee erred in accepting his plea of guilty to violation of a disciplinary rule and in imposing a $50 fine. We agree with petitioner that the fine is invalid. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988). We do not agree that his plea was.

Fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watson v. Oregon State Penitentiary
750 P.2d 1188 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
754 P.2d 35, 91 Or. App. 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-oregon-state-penitentiary-orctapp-1988.