Pearson v. Old Stone Savings Bank
116 R.I. 915
This text of 116 R.I. 915 (Pearson v. Old Stone Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pearson v. Old Stone Savings Bank, 116 R.I. 915 (R.I. 1976).
Opinion
Motion of plaintiffs for an injunction pending appeal under Rule 8 is not properly before the court since no appeal lies from the denial of a preliminary injunction. G. L. 1956 (1969 Reenactment) §9-24-1,7. See Ross v. Mencoff, 82 R. I. 461, 11 A.2d 356 (1955). 1 Kent, R. I. Civ. Prac. §65.5. Accordingly, the motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bochicchio v. Petrocelli
11 A.2d 356 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1940)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
116 R.I. 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-old-stone-savings-bank-ri-1976.