Pearson v. Old Stone Savings Bank
116 R.I. 915
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pearson v. Old Stone Savings Bank. Read the opinion of the Court — 119 R.I. 836 →
Opinion
Motion of plaintiffs for an injunction pending appeal under Rule 8 is not properly before the court since no appeal lies from the denial of a preliminary injunction. G. L. 1956 (1969 Reenactment) §9-24-1,7. See Ross v. Mencoff, 82 R. I. 461, 11 A.2d 356 (1955). 1 Kent, R. I. Civ. Prac. §65.5. Accordingly, the motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pearson v. Old Stone Savings Bank, 116 R.I. 915 (R.I. 1976).
116 R.I. 915 (Pearson v. Old Stone Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bochicchio v. Petrocelli
11 A.2d 356 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1940)