Pearson v. Martin
356 S.E.2d 789, 319 N.C. 678
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pearson v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 319 N.C. 449 →
Opinion
Ernest C. PEARSON
v.
James G. MARTIN, in his capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina; Lacy H. Thornburg, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of North Carolina; Joyce A. Hamilton; Donald W. Overby; Fred M. Morelock; and Thomas W. Steed, Jr., in his capacity as President of the Wake County Bar Association.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Hunter, Hodgman, Greene, Donaldson, Cooke & Elam, Greensboro, for plaintiff.
Jean A. Benoy, Sr. Deputy Atty. Gen., and Isham B. Hudson, Jr., Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
*790 "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of June 1987."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pearson v. Martin, 356 S.E.2d 789, 319 N.C. 678 (N.C. 1987).
356 S.E.2d 789 (Pearson v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. Solon Automated Services
356 S.E.2d 789 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1987)