Pearson v. King Features Syndicate, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pearson v. King Features Syndicate, Inc.

277 A.D.2d 871

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 871 (Pearson v. King Features Syndicate, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearson v. King Features Syndicate, Inc., 277 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and the motions in all respects granted, with leave to the defendants to serve second amended answers which shall follow the form of appropriate pleading, and consist of plain and concise statements of ultimate facts in defense of the charges. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Dore and Van Voorhis, JJ., dissent and vote to modify by striking out paragraphs XXV to XXX, inclusive, of the amended answer to the amended and supplemental complaint, with leave to replead to the fourth and fifth causes of action in the amended and .supplemental complaint and, as so modifiled, to affirm. No opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and the motions in all respects granted, with leave to the defendants to serve second amended answers which shall follow the form of appropriate pleading, and consist of plain and concise statements of ultimate facts in defense of the charges. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Dore and Van Voorhis, JJ., dissent and vote to modify by striking out paragraphs XXV to XXX, inclusive, of the amended answer to the amended and supplemental complaint, with leave to replead to the fourth and fifth causes of action in the amended and .supplemental complaint and, as so modifiled, to affirm. No opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-king-features-syndicate-inc-nyappdiv-1950.