Pearson v. Jones

Illinois Circuit Court

Pearson v. Jones

3 Ill. Cir. Ct. 352

Illinois Circuit Court·Decided July 1, 1874·Published

Opinion

McAllister, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground, as is alleged, that all the parties praying the appeal did not join in executing the bond. This was a suit against the estate of one Darwin and the minor heirs sued by him. The general guardian prayed an appeal, and he executed the bond. There would be no sense at all in having the minors joined on the bond, and the motion is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAllister, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground, as is alleged, that all the parties praying the appeal did not join in executing the bond. This was a suit against the estate of one Darwin and the minor heirs sued by him. The general guardian prayed an appeal, and he executed the bond. There would be no sense at all in having the minors joined on the bond, and the motion is overruled.

Pearson v. Jones, 3 Ill. Cir. Ct. 352 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1874).

Pincite

3 Ill. Cir. Ct. 352 (Pearson v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.