Pearson v. Jones

Illinois Circuit Court

Pearson v. Jones

3 Ill. Cir. Ct. 352

DecidedJuly 1, 1874

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Ill. Cir. Ct. 352 (Pearson v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearson v. Jones, 3 Ill. Cir. Ct. 352 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

McAllister, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground, as is alleged, that all the parties praying the appeal did not join in executing the bond. This was a suit against the estate of one Darwin and the minor heirs sued by him. The general guardian prayed an appeal, and he executed the bond. There would be no sense at all in having the minors joined on the bond, and the motion is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAllister, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground, as is alleged, that all the parties praying the appeal did not join in executing the bond. This was a suit against the estate of one Darwin and the minor heirs sued by him. The general guardian prayed an appeal, and he executed the bond. There would be no sense at all in having the minors joined on the bond, and the motion is overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Ill. Cir. Ct. 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-jones-illcirct-1874.