Pearson v. Hancock & Son

Supreme Court of Alabama

Pearson v. Hancock & Son

78 So. 806, 201 Ala. 428, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 57

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedApril 18, 1918

Docket5 Div. 705.

StatusPublished

This text of 78 So. 806 (Pearson v. Hancock & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearson v. Hancock & Son, 78 So. 806, 201 Ala. 428, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 57 (Ala. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

MAYFIELD, J.

If there be any error in the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the judgment of the lower court, that error is based on a finding of facts. It has’ been uniformly ruled by this court that we would not review the Court of Appeals as to findings otf facts. If the facts as found by the Court- of Appeals are as stated in the opinion, then the decision is correct!. We find no principle) of law decided erroneously.

It results that the application for certiorari must be denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MAYFIELD, J.

If there be any error in the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the judgment of the lower court, that error is based on a finding of facts. It has’ been uniformly ruled by this court that we would not review the Court of Appeals as to findings otf facts. If the facts as found by the Court- of Appeals are as stated in the opinion, then the decision is correct!. We find no principle) of law decided erroneously.

It results that the application for certiorari must be denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 So. 806, 201 Ala. 428, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-hancock-son-ala-1918.