Pearson v. Franks

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7185

DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MITCHELL FRANKS, Warden; MARGARET CHIPPENDALE, F.A.; ROYCE MARSHALL, Property Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA- 05-1739-RDB)

Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 18, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demetric Gray Pearson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Pearson v. Franks, No. CA-05-1739-RDB (D. Md. July 5, 2005). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -