Pearson v. Eames

3 N.H. 523

Opinion

By the court.

If the plaintiff in this case had treated all the pleadings, on the part of the defendant, as one plea, and had demurred to it, assigning duplicity as a cause of demurrer, it might have deserved consideration, rvhether the pleas, in their present shape, could have been supported. But it is very clear, that on this demurrer the second plea is in form sufficient. The case of Ryley vs. Parkhurst et a. (1 Wils. 219,) is directly in point.

JudgmentJor the defendant.