Pearson v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE
This text of 306 S.W.3d 653 (Pearson v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Director of Revenue appeals from the trial court’s judgment reinstating the driving privileges of petitioner, Anthony C. Pearson, after the Director suspended them pursuant to section 302.505 RSMo (2000). The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memoran *654 dum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
306 S.W.3d 653, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 158, 2010 WL 528069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-director-of-revenue-state-moctapp-2010.