Pearson v. C.P. Buckner Steel Erection
This text of Pearson v. C.P. Buckner Steel Erection (Pearson v. C.P. Buckner Steel Erection) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The undersigned have reviewed the prior Order based upon the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has shown good ground to reconsider the evidence. The Full Commission reverses the 7 August 1998 Order of Commissioner Bolch, and enters the following Opinion and Award.
***********
Based upon the record, the Full Commission enters the following:
2. Cary Manor intervened at the Full Commission level prior to defendants' appeal to the North Carolina Court of Appeals.
3. Both Cary Manor and plaintiff moved for an order of the Full Commission directing defendants to pay to the medical providers in this case the difference between the fees allowed under the Medical Fee Schedule of the North Carolina Industrial Commission and the fees charged by the providers to Medicaid. By order for the Full Commission by Commissioner Thomas J. Bolch, filed 19 December 1995, the motions of Cary Manor and plaintiff were allowed. Defendants appealed the Full Commission's 19 December 1995 Order to the Court of Appeals.
4. On 15 July 1997, the Court of Appeals filed a decision reversing the Full Commission. Upon petition for review by both plaintiff and Cary Manor, the Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals in a unanimous decision filed on 8 May 1998, and reinstated the Full Commission's 19 December 1995 Order.
5. Upon remand to the Industrial Commission, plaintiff and Cary Manor separately petitioned for attorney's fees taxed to defendants pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. §
6. The 7 August 1998 Order of Commissioner Thomas J. Bolch was made in a summary manner, without detailed findings of fact.
7. Upon receipt of the 7 August 1998 Order, defendants timely petitioned for Full Commission review pursuant to Rule 703 of the Workers' Compensation Rules. Cary Manor moved for a dismissal of defendants' application for review for failure to timely appeal to the proper tribunal, contending that under N.C. Gen. Stat. §
Based upon the findings of fact, the Full Commission concludes as follows:
2. N.C. Gen. Stat. §
3. In order for a party to prevail upon a motion for attorney's fees brought pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. §
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Full Commission reverses the 7 August 1998 Order of Commissioner Thomas J. Bolch and enters the following:
2. The intervenor's motion to recover attorney's fees from defendants pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. §
3. The award of attorney's fees to the intervenor in the amount of $10,000.00 is reversed.
4. The parties shall divide the costs of this action.
This the ___ day of March 1999.
S/_____________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
S/_____________ RENEE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER
DCS/jbd
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pearson v. C.P. Buckner Steel Erection, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-cp-buckner-steel-erection-ncworkcompcom-1999.