Pearson v. BMI & Twentieth Century Fox (Records)

173 F. App'x 837
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 10, 2005
DocketNo. 05-7083
StatusPublished

This text of 173 F. App'x 837 (Pearson v. BMI & Twentieth Century Fox (Records)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pearson v. BMI & Twentieth Century Fox (Records), 173 F. App'x 837 (D.C. Cir. 2005).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief, the amended brief, and the appendix filed by appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed May 17,2005 be affirmed. The court properly dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to meet the minimal pleading standards of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a) and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(2).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(2)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 F. App'x 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-bmi-twentieth-century-fox-records-cadc-2005.