Pearson & Maluso, M.D., P.A. v. Bott

584 So. 2d 1035, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7550, 1991 WL 134863
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 25, 1991·No. No. 90-1534·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a temporary injunction. We quash the injunction because it was entered without proper verified pleadings or sworn evidentiary support. Additionally, the trial judge failed to make sufficient factual determinations to support the injunction. See e.g., City of Miami v. Coll, 546 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); United Steelworkers of America v. Seminole Asphalt Refining, Inc., 269 So.2d 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972).

The order is quashed and this cause remanded. Should appellee submit a new, proper petition for injunctive relief the court can entertain and grant it, if it deems it appropriate.

ORDER QUASHED; REMANDED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pearson & Maluso, M.D., P.A. v. Bott, 584 So. 2d 1035, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7550, 1991 WL 134863 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

584 So. 2d 1035 (Pearson & Maluso, M.D., P.A. v. Bott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Industrial Waste Services, Inc. v. Faircloth Sanitation, Inc.
643 So. 2d 688 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Burdick v. State
584 So. 2d 1035 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)