Pearson &. Co. v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Georgia

Pearson &. Co. v. McDaniel

62 Ga. 100

DecidedAugust 15, 1878

StatusPublished

This text of 62 Ga. 100 (Pearson &. Co. v. McDaniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearson &. Co. v. McDaniel, 62 Ga. 100 (Ga. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Jackson, Justice.

But two points are made in this record.

1. First, it is said that the letters were improperly admitted. We think not. Proof was made that from correspondence with the firm the witness was acquainted with the handwriting, and that the letters were theirs, received by due course of mail. This was enough to admit them. See Code, §3833; 30 Ga., 476; 39 Ga., 545, cited by defendant in error.

2. Secondly, that the verdict is contrary to the law and evidence. We agree with the presiding judge that it is not, and affirm the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson, Justice.

But two points are made in this record.

1. First, it is said that the letters were improperly admitted. We think not. Proof was made that from correspondence with the firm the witness was acquainted with the handwriting, and that the letters were theirs, received by due course of mail. This was enough to admit them. See Code, §3833; 30 Ga., 476; 39 Ga., 545, cited by defendant in error.

2. Secondly, that the verdict is contrary to the law and evidence. We agree with the presiding judge that it is not, and affirm the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 Ga. 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-co-v-mcdaniel-ga-1878.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack