Pearson Candy Co. v. Huyen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Pearson Candy Co. v. Huyen

380 N.W.2d 764, 1986 Minn. LEXIS 1156

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided January 24, 1986·No. No. C6-85-295·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Johannes K. Huyen, Director, St. Paul Department of Human Rights, for further review be, and the same is, granted [765] for the limited purpose of remanding the matter to the Court of Appeals for its reconsideration of the record as a whole with respect to the proper standard of review contained in 1965 Minn. Laws, ch. 866, section 1 as amended by 1983 Minn. Laws, ch. 30, section 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Johannes K. Huyen, Director, St. Paul Department of Human Rights, for further review be, and the same is, granted [765] for the limited purpose of remanding the matter to the Court of Appeals for its reconsideration of the record as a whole with respect to the proper standard of review contained in 1965 Minn. Laws, ch. 866, section 1 as amended by 1983 Minn. Laws, ch. 30, section 1.

Pearson Candy Co. v. Huyen, 380 N.W.2d 764, 1986 Minn. LEXIS 1156 (Mich. 1986).

Pincite

380 N.W.2d 764 (Pearson Candy Co. v. Huyen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.