Pearson Candy Co. v. Huyen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Pearson Candy Co. v. Huyen

380 N.W.2d 764, 1986 Minn. LEXIS 1156

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 24, 1986

DocketNo. C6-85-295

StatusPublished

This text of 380 N.W.2d 764 (Pearson Candy Co. v. Huyen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearson Candy Co. v. Huyen, 380 N.W.2d 764, 1986 Minn. LEXIS 1156 (Mich. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Johannes K. Huyen, Director, St. Paul Department of Human Rights, for further review be, and the same is, granted [765]*765for the limited purpose of remanding the matter to the Court of Appeals for its reconsideration of the record as a whole with respect to the proper standard of review contained in 1965 Minn. Laws, ch. 866, section 1 as amended by 1983 Minn. Laws, ch. 30, section 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Johannes K. Huyen, Director, St. Paul Department of Human Rights, for further review be, and the same is, granted [765]*765for the limited purpose of remanding the matter to the Court of Appeals for its reconsideration of the record as a whole with respect to the proper standard of review contained in 1965 Minn. Laws, ch. 866, section 1 as amended by 1983 Minn. Laws, ch. 30, section 1.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

380 N.W.2d 764, 1986 Minn. LEXIS 1156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-candy-co-v-huyen-minn-1986.