Pearse v. Templeton.

3 N.C. 379
CourtSuperior Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1806
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 379 (Pearse v. Templeton.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pearse v. Templeton., 3 N.C. 379 (N.C. Ct. App. 1806).

Opinion

Hall, Judge.-

The record ought to be read, but can prove no more than that the plaintiff did not recover. It will not be of itself, proof that Joseph Pearse had tide.

The record tvas read, and Judge Hall directed the jury that the plaintiff should have proved Joseph Pearse’s title ; and that he had not done so, for the record was not evidence of that j and the plaintiff hearing the opinion of the court, suffered

A nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.C. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearse-v-templeton-ncsuperct-1806.