Pearse v. Redman

Indiana Supreme Court

Pearse v. Redman

51 Ind. 539

DecidedNovember 15, 1875

StatusPublished

This text of 51 Ind. 539 (Pearse v. Redman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearse v. Redman, 51 Ind. 539 (Ind. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

Pettit, J.

The appellee, Robert L. Redman, recovered a joint judgment against Simeon H. Pearse, Edward Brown, and "William Black, administrator of Conyngton, deceased. Pearse and Brown only appealed, and have assigned errors in their names only, without joining their co-defendant. This assignment of error cannot be sustained. Rabb v. Graham, 43 Ind. 1; Barger v. Manning, 43 Ind. 472.

The appeal, under these and many other authorities, must be dismissed, at the costs of the appellant, which is done. Motion to reinstate overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pettit, J.

The appellee, Robert L. Redman, recovered a joint judgment against Simeon H. Pearse, Edward Brown, and "William Black, administrator of Conyngton, deceased. Pearse and Brown only appealed, and have assigned errors in their names only, without joining their co-defendant. This assignment of error cannot be sustained. Rabb v. Graham, 43 Ind. 1; Barger v. Manning, 43 Ind. 472.

The appeal, under these and many other authorities, must be dismissed, at the costs of the appellant, which is done. Motion to reinstate overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 Ind. 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearse-v-redman-ind-1875.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack