Pearsall v. Tribal Council for the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community

5 Am. Tribal Law 105

Grand Ronde Tribal Court·Decided July 22, 2004·No. No. C-02-10-007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

DON OWEN COSTELLO, Pro Tem Judge.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiffs motion to consolidate this action with Pearsall v. Tribal Council, et al, Case No. C-03-04-001 is denied.

2. Plaintiffs motion to strike or disregard untimely motions by defendants Rei-bach and Haller is denied.

3. Plaintiffs motion for leave to file rejoinder memorandum opposing motions to dismiss is denied.

4. Defendants Reibach’s and Haller’s motions for sanctions are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

DON OWEN COSTELLO, Pro Tem Judge.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiffs motion to consolidate this action with Pearsall v. Tribal Council, et al, Case No. C-03-04-001 is denied.

2. Plaintiffs motion to strike or disregard untimely motions by defendants Rei-bach and Haller is denied.

3. Plaintiffs motion for leave to file rejoinder memorandum opposing motions to dismiss is denied.

4. Defendants Reibach’s and Haller’s motions for sanctions are denied.

Pearsall v. Tribal Council for the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community, 5 Am. Tribal Law 105 (grrondect 2004).

Pincite

5 Am. Tribal Law 105 (Pearsall v. Tribal Council for the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.