Pearsall v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.

97 N.Y.S. 1143

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order afirmed, with costs.

KRUSE, J.,

dissents, upon the ground that ividence of the meaning and application of the ule relating to junctions was improperly ex-luded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pearsall v. New York Cent. & H. R. R., 97 N.Y.S. 1143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

97 N.Y.S. 1143 (Pearsall v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.