Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Pearsall v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.

Pearsall v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.

97 N.Y.S. 1143
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 28, 1906
StatusPublished

This text of 97 N.Y.S. 1143 (Pearsall v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pearsall v. New York Cent. & H. R. R., 97 N.Y.S. 1143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order afirmed, with costs.

KRUSE, J.,

dissents, upon the ground that ividence of the meaning and application of the ule relating to junctions was improperly ex-luded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 N.Y.S. 1143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearsall-v-new-york-cent-h-r-r-nyappdiv-1906.